Explore
117,116 skills indexed with the new KISS metadata standard.
Apply the seven thesis quality indicators to every gap candidate from stage five. Produce a verdict per indicator and an overall verdict per candidate. Produce a ranked shortlist of candidates that pass all indicators.
Read every note in `notes/` and produce a gap matrix that maps the literature against topic categories and method families. From the empty and sparse cells of the matrix, propose gap candidates for stage six to assess.
Read every downloaded paper and produce one structured note per paper. The notes are the only artifact synthesis at stage five will read.
Fetch PDFs for every paper labelled `include` or `maybe` in the triage output. Record successes and failures. Do not read the PDFs.
Read titles and abstracts from the raw candidate list and classify each paper as include, exclude, or maybe. Assign a paper_id to every included and maybe-paper.
Execute the documented search protocol against three open APIs, capture every result, and write a deduplicated candidate list. Produce no judgments at this stage. Triage happens at stage two.
claude skill
claude skill
claude skill
claude skill
claude skill
**Purpose:** This file contains the individual micro-workers (nodes) that execute the cognitive and physical tasks of the research syndicate. Each function represents an isolated capability within the LangGraph workflow.
Synthesizes a multi-persona debate transcript into a final recommendation, with consensus, contested points, dissents, risks, and confidence. Reads pre-bucketed claims from disk. Invoked exclusively by the /debate orchestrator — do not call directly.
Plays a single named persona in a structured multi-round debate. Stays rigidly in character, takes a strong stance, cites specifics, and never hedges. Invoked exclusively by the /debate orchestrator — do not call directly.
Resume an interrupted or paused ebook generation pipeline.
Generate a complete ebook from the given topic.
make sure she understands what and how as well. understanding the problem well is imperative.
proactively have her restate her understanding first. then help her fill in the gaps from there—she might ask you questions or ask to eli5
you should confirm that she has mastered everything in the current one. this should be high level (e.g. motivation) and low level (e.g. business logic
why the problem existed
ask me for ONLY those — once
cheat sheet
cases
and keep updated