Peqy

Review the comments left by peqy[bot] on a pull request and assess whether each comment is valid, actionable, and consistent with the codebase's existing patterns.

Steps

Determine the PR number:
- If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the PR number
- Otherwise, detect the current branch and find its open PR using gh pr view --json number
Fetch all review comments from peqy using:
```
gh api repos/rhesis-ai/rhesis/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments
```
Filter to comments from peqy[bot].
For each comment:
- Read the file and lines referenced in the comment
- Investigate the surrounding codebase for existing patterns and conventions
- Assess validity considering:
  - Does the suggestion match existing patterns in the codebase?
  - Would applying it introduce inconsistency (e.g. adding a comment only in one place when the same pattern exists uncommented elsewhere)?
  - Is the concern real or theoretical?
  - Does it conflict with project conventions in CLAUDE.md?
- Classify as: Valid (worth fixing), Marginal (technically correct but not worth changing), or Invalid (wrong or inconsistent with codebase)
Present a summary table:

# Comment File Verdict Reasoning
For comments classified as Valid, ask the user if they want them applied.

Review the comments left by peqy[bot] on a pull request and assess whether each comment is valid, actionable, and consistent with the codebase's existing patterns.

Steps

Determine the PR number:
- If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the PR number
- Otherwise, detect the current branch and find its open PR using gh pr view --json number
Fetch all review comments from peqy using:
```
gh api repos/rhesis-ai/rhesis/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments
```
Filter to comments from peqy[bot].
For each comment:
- Read the file and lines referenced in the comment
- Investigate the surrounding codebase for existing patterns and conventions
- Assess validity considering:
  - Does the suggestion match existing patterns in the codebase?
  - Would applying it introduce inconsistency (e.g. adding a comment only in one place when the same pattern exists uncommented elsewhere)?
  - Is the concern real or theoretical?
  - Does it conflict with project conventions in CLAUDE.md?
- Classify as: Valid (worth fixing), Marginal (technically correct but not worth changing), or Invalid (wrong or inconsistent with codebase)
Present a summary table:

# Comment File Verdict Reasoning
For comments classified as Valid, ask the user if they want them applied.

Additional Files (3)

Steps

Related Skills

<h1 align="center">

Frontend Typescript Linting.mdc

2. Apply Deepthink Protocol (reason about dependencies

Additional Files (3)

Steps