pr_compliances:

pr_compliances:

• title: "Consistent Naming Conventions" compliance_label: false objective: "All new variables, functions, and classes must follow the project's established naming standards" success_criteria: "All identifiers follow the established naming patterns (camelCase, snake_case, etc.)" failure_criteria: "Inconsistent or non-standard naming that deviates from project conventions"

• title: "No Dead or Commented-Out Code" compliance_label: false objective: "Keep the codebase clean by ensuring all submitted code is active and necessary" success_criteria: "All code in the PR is active and serves a purpose; no commented-out blocks" failure_criteria: "Presence of unused, dead, or commented-out code sections"

• title: "Robust Error Handling" compliance_label: false objective: "Ensure potential errors and edge cases are anticipated and handled gracefully throughout the code" success_criteria: "All error scenarios are properly caught and handled with appropriate responses" failure_criteria: "Unhandled exceptions, ignored errors, or missing edge case handling"

• title: "Single Responsibility for Functions" compliance_label: false objective: "Each function should have a single, well-defined responsibility" success_criteria: "Functions perform one cohesive task with a single purpose" failure_criteria: "Functions that combine multiple unrelated operations or handle several distinct concerns"

• title: "When relevant, utilize early return" compliance_label: false objective: "In a code snippet containing multiple logic conditions (such as 'if-else'), prefer an early return on edge cases than deep nesting" success_criteria: "When relevant, utilize early return that reduces nesting" failure_criteria: "Unjustified deep nesting that can be simplified by early return"